照片來源:網路
Ken Rockwell也在今日刊出了他對新小小黑 Nikon 70-200mm f4 VR的評測。
可以預期的,新小小黑也贏得了Ken Rockwell的極佳評價。
他也認為f2.8是底片時代的產物,數位時代裡,f4已經綽綽有餘!
也說了他覺得哪種攝影才需要這支鏡頭。
以下對Ken Rockewell的結論做重點翻譯:(原文全文請點此)
在原文的建議(Recommendation)段落,Ken Rockwell說道:
I don't bother with f/2.8 tele zooms when shooting digital. I use them only when shooting35mm, otherwise,
they're too heavy. f/2.8 lenses went out with 35mm film, which only went to about ISO 100 before it started looking ratty. With digital, f/4 and f/5.6 are more than fast enough. It's high time Nikon finally got with the program
to make a practical tele zoom like this again so we don't have to hump the f/2.8 beasts.
當我用數位機身時我並不在意望遠變焦鏡是不是f2.8,我只在用35mm相機時使用他們。
不然他們實在是太重了。f2.8的鏡頭是與35mm底片機一起推出的,他們只能用到ISO 100,不然畫質就變糟了。
但用數位機身時,f/4或f/5.6已經夠大了。
Nikon終於又推出這樣實用的望遠變焦鏡,讓我們不用再背著f2.8怪獸了。
If you want a Nikon tele zoom for FX, this is a great lens. If you worry about defocus blur, there is very
little difference between f/4 and f/2.8; try it on your f/2.8 tele and you'll see. If you really want great background blur, skip zooms and go straight to the 135mm f/2 DCor 200mm f/2 or 300mm f/2.8, as pro
portraitists use (or the perfectly good 135mm f/2 AI-s for you bargain hunters).
70-200mm zooms are for news, sports and landscapes, not static portraiture.
如果你想要隻FX適用的Nikon望遠變焦鏡,這隻是很棒的鏡頭。
如果你擔心散景的話,f/4和f2.8的差異非常小,用你的f2.8望遠試試看你就了解了。
如果你真的很想要超讚的散景的話,不用理變焦鏡了,直上135mm f/2 DC或 200mm f/2 或 300mm f/2.8吧!
專業人像攝影師都用這些鏡頭,(也省錢的話,135mm f/2 AI-s也不錯)
70-200mm變焦是給新聞、運動和風景用的,不是靜態人像。
其他評測內容都和其他方的結果差不多,少數幾個KR比較不同的地方如下:
他提到,這支鏡頭銳利得誇張(insanely sharp),比24-70 2.8銳利,跟小黑六差不多。
也許只有105mm 或200mm MICRO-NIKKOR比他稍微銳利些。
對焦方面,整體來說是快速且安靜準確,除了在近距離(1m)使用200端 f/4下,沒有準焦。
(At close distances (1 meter/3 feet) at 200mm, autofocus is off on my sample)
如果你在猶豫要不要加購腳架座,KR說不用了,因為他連鏡皇都沒在用腳架座,直接用機身上腳架……
有興趣看KR評測全文者,請點此
相關文章:
DxOmark對新小小黑Nikon 70-200mm f/4G ED VR測試出爐
留言列表